Posted on Leave a comment

Systems and Asylum Procedures

After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures around Europe, new technologies have become reviving these systems. From lie detection tools examined at the edge to a program for verifying documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of systems is being found in asylum applications. This article is exploring just how these solutions have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. It reveals just how asylum seekers will be transformed into required hindered techno-users: They are asked to conform to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and also to keep up with unstable tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This obstructs their capacity to run these devices and to follow their right for cover.

It also demonstrates how these types of technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They aid the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of distributed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity simply by hindering these people from interacting with the programs of safeguard. It further argues that studies of securitization and victimization should be coupled with an insight in the disciplinary mechanisms of the technologies, by which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects exactly who are self-disciplined by their dependence on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article states that these solutions have an inherent obstructiveness. They have a double effect: www.ascella-llc.com/generated-post/ while they assistance to expedite the asylum method, they also help to make it difficult just for refugees to navigate these types of systems. They can be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes these people vulnerable to bogus decisions created by non-governmental celebrities, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their conditions. Moreover, they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *